Second
Unregistered
|
 |
Posted: Jan. 06 2004,13:12 |
 |
4. when merging - make another mode, where one source be selected as "master", the other as "slave" - or "up-to-date" and "to-be-updated" - and then any links that are NOT present in the master/up-to-date, but ARE present in the slave/to-be-updated should be DELETED.
Maybe this is not the best way to do the things, but that is I can think of now. Maybe you will find some more creative solution - by looking at file's time/date (but does Bookmarks in Netscape/Opera have time/date of creation/modify?) or whatever. The goal is - if some links are removed by the user on purpose - the synchronization to work so, that they are not "restored" from the older bookmark source...
Or maybe in the BCM's bookmark browser add ability to delete/rename/move/copy/create and to somehow "mark changes as master and synchronize".... but it is more convenient to use the web-browser bookmark managing tools (for me - just "explore Favorites" and then using same methods as for files), not some yet-another-way-of-doing-the-same-thing....
|
