Jason
Board Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: Mar. 2006 |
 |
Posted: Mar. 14 2006,14:57 |
 |
Thanks, Magnus. Yes, as I describe the program to friends or colleagues when they ask me what I recommend to do tagging, I tell them that in my ~1000 cd music collection I've never come across anything I wanted to be able to do that MP3 Tag Studio could not do. Flexible it certainly is.
If you don't mind a follow-on question on the macros, let's say that of all the Disc 1 of 2's in my collection, the lowest number of tracks on Disc 1 is 8 and the highest number is 34 (Beatles Anthology, back when songs were 2:30). I'd then be recording (34-7=) 27 different macros, and call them "add8" "add9" "add10" . . . "add34".
What I'm wondering is does recording each of those macros involve recording just one step which would be to tell it to "add n" to the TrackNr? Cause if I'm understanding correctly it would actually be that each of the 27 macros would involve as many steps as there might be tracks on Disc 2.
So, for example, in the "add11" macro, I would record it filtering on TrackNr 1, setting all TrackNr to 12, then change filter to TrackNr2, set all TrackNr to 13, change filter to TrackNr3, set all TrackNr to 14, and so forth.
While this would create a truly automated solution, there would be 918 steps (27 macros x up to 34 tracks on the second disc) of changing the filter and changing the MassSet TrackNr to collect them.
I wonder, can I reference calberga's external file in a macro? In that case, I can instead create an external file listing numbers 9 through 100, save it as "add8.txt" then delete the top number, save it as "add9.txt" and so forth until I get to "add34.txt".
I'd then record 27 macros, just like above, but now each one would involve just a couple of steps instead of 34. The "add9" macro would involve going to the "Tag/Rename from List" tab, the selecting the "add9.txt" file, selecting TrackNr and Executing, and it would just need one pass through the folder to retag them all.
Can macros reference external files in such a way?
--Jason
|