Magnus Brading
Almighty Author

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 2751
Joined: Aug. 2002 |
 |
Posted: Sep. 18 2002,02:05 |
 |
The reason that I don't have any fully automatic mass-processing options on the repair tools is that some of them are potentially dangerous to run on non-damaged files (not so much the VBR-fix though). You can be sure that some people would run it recursively on their whole mp3 collection, and then send me very angry mails about me destroying their mp3s, threatening to sue me or bad-mouth my program on the internet etc (actually it has already happend several times that people have had all their files in one directory, selected and processed them all and then sending me such mails anyway). 
About the "only fix files with an incorrect or non-present header" suggestion, what difference would it make? If the header is correct, it will only be overwritten with practically the same data again, making no difference. And if it is the time you are concerned about, the analysis takes 99,9% of the total processing time for each file anyway, and this has to be performed in any case to know that any current header is correct or not, so that doesn't matter either.
-------------- Software author and website owner
|